Searching in the Context of a Task: A Review of Methods and Tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19153/cleiej.21.1.1Keywords:
Context-Based Search, Task-Based Search, Topical Search, Information Retrieval, PersonalizationAbstract
Contextual information extracted from the user task can help to better target retrieval to task-relevant content. In particular, topical context can be exploited to identify the subject of the information needs, contributing to reduce the information overload problem. A great number of methods exist to extract raw context data and contextual interaction patterns from the user task and to model this information using higher-level representations. Context can then be used as a source for automatic query generation, or as a means to refine or disambiguate user-generated queries. It can also be used to filter and rank results as well as to select domain-specific search engines with better capabilities to satisfy specific information requests. This article reviews methods that have been applied to deal with the problem of reflecting the current and long-term interests of a user in the search process. It discusses major difficulties encountered in the research area of context-based information retrieval and presents an overview of tools proposed since the mid-nineties to deal with the problem of context-based search.
References
[1] Q. Liu, H. Ma, E. Chen, and H. Xiong, “A survey of context-aware mobile recommendations,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 12, no. 01, pp. 139–172, 2013.
[2] P. Makris, D. N. Skoutas, and C. Skianis, “A survey on context-aware mobile and wireless networking: on networking and computing environments’ integration,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 362–386, 2013.
[3] C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, “Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 414–454, 2014.
[4] J. Augusto, A. Aztiria, D. Kramer, and U. Alegre, “A survey on the evolution of the notion of context- awareness,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–30, 2018.
[5] A. K. Dey, G. D. Abowd, and D. Salber, “A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications,” Human-computer interaction, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 97–166, 2001.
[6] K. A. De Jong, “An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1975, aAI7609381.
[7] C. Bolchini, C. A. Curino, E. Quintarelli, F. A. Schreiber, and L. Tanca, “A data-oriented survey of context models,” ACM Sigmod Record, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 19–26, 2007.
[8] D. Boughareb and N. Farah, “Context in information retrieval,” in International Conference on Con- trol, Decision and Information Technologies, ser. CoDIT 2014, 2014, pp. 589–594.
[9] H. P. Luhn, “A statistical approach to mechanized encoding and searching of literary information,”IBM Journal of research and development, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 1957.
[10] S. K. Jones, “A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 28, pp. 11–21, 1972.
[11] G. Salton and C. Yang, “On the specification of term values in automatic indexing,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 29, pp. 351–372, 1973.
[12] S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman, “Indexing by latent semantic analysis,” Journal of the American Society of Information Science, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 391–407, 1990.
[13] P. Resnik, “Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, ser. IJCAI’95. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995, pp. 448–453.
[14] D. Lin, “An information-theoretic definition of similarity.” in In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 98, 1998, pp. 296–304.
[15] P. D. Turney, “Mining the web for synonyms: Pmi-ir versus lsa on toefl,” in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, ser. EMCL ’01. London, UK, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2001, pp. 491–502.
[16] D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent dirichlet allocation,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 3, pp. 993–1022, Mar. 2003.
[17] A. G. Maguitman, F. Menczer, H. Roinestad, and A. Vespignani, “Algorithmic detection of semantic similarity,” in WWW ’05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 107–116.
[18] A. Gruber, M. Rosen-zvi, and Y. Weiss, “Hidden topic markov models,” in In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2007.
[19] D. M. Blei, “Probabilistic topic models,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 77–84, Apr.
2012.
[20] X. Wang, A. McCallum, and X. Wei, “Topical n-grams: Phrase and topic discovery, with an application to information retrieval,” in Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007). IEEE, 2007, pp. 697–702.
[21] N. Cristianini, J. Shawe-Taylor, and H. Lodhi, “Latent semantic kernels,” in Proceedings of the Eigh- teenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. ICML ’01. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2001, pp. 66–73.
[22] N. Liu, B. Zhang, J. Yan, Q. Yang, S. Yan, Z. Chen, F. Bai, and W.-Y. Ma, “Learning similarity measures in non-orthogonal space,” in Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2004, pp. 334–341.
[23] A. Maguitman, D. Leake, T. Reichherzer, and F. Menczer, “Dynamic Extraction of Topic Descriptors and Discriminators: Towards Automatic Context-Based Topic Search,” in Proceedings of the Thir- teenth Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). New York: ACM Press, November 2004, pp. 463–472.
[24] C. M. Lorenzetti and A. G. Maguitman, “A semi-supervised incremental algorithm to automatically formulate topical queries,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 12, pp. 1881–1892, 2009, including Special Issue on Web Search.
[25] R. R. Rada, H. Mili, E. Bicknell, and M. Blettner, “Development and application of a metric on Semantic Nets,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 1989.
[26] J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath, “Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X), Taiwan, 1998.
[27] L. Finkelstein, E. Gabrilovich, Y. Matias, E. Rivlin, Z. Solan, G. Wolfman, and E. Ruppin, “Placing search in context: The concept revisited,” in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2001, pp. 406–414.
[28] R. Kaptein and J. Kamps, “Explicit extraction of topical context,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1548–1563, 2011.
[29] P. A. Chirita, W. Nejdl, R. Paiu, and C. Kohlschu¨tter, “Using odp metadata to personalize search,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 178–185.
[30] J. Trajkova and S. Gauch, “Improving ontology-based user profiles,” in Coupling approaches, cou- pling media and coupling languages for information retrieval. LE CENTRE DE HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES D’INFORMATIQUE DOCUMENTAIRE, 2004, pp. 380–390.
[31] S. Calegari and G. Pasi, “Personal ontologies: Generation of user profiles based on the {YAGO} ontology,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 640 – 658, 2013, personalization and Recommendation in Information Access.
[32] N. Hernandez, J. Mothe, C. Chrisment, and D. Egret, “Modeling context through domain ontologies,”
Inf. Retr., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 143–172, Apr. 2007.
[33] B. J. Rhodes and T. Starner, “The Remembrance Agent: A continuously running automated in- formation retrieval system,” in Proceedings of The First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology (PAAM ’96). London, UK: AAAI Press, April 1996, pp. 487–495.
[34] J. Budzik and K. Hammond, “Watson: Anticipating and contextualizing information needs,” in 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ, 1999.
[35] J.-J. Yang and R. Korfhage, “Query optimization in information retrieval using genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1993, pp. 603–613.
[36] R. L. Cecchini, C. M. Lorenzetti, A. G. Maguitman, and N. B. Brignole, “Using genetic algorithms to evolve a population of topical queries,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1863–1878, 2008.
[37] ——, “Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Context-based Search,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1258–1274, 2010.
[38] O. Cord´on, E. Herrera-Viedma, and M. Luque, “Evolutionary learning of boolean queries by multiob- jective genetic programming,” in International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Springer, 2002, pp. 710–719.
[39] L. Ardissono and G. Bosio, “Context-dependent awareness support in open collaboration environ- ments,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 223–254, 2012.
[40] J. Greenberg, “An examination of the impact of lexical-semantic relationships on retrieval effectiveness during the query expansion process,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1998.
[41] M. Chui, “i still haven’t found what i’m looking for: Web searching as query refinement,” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 2002.
[42] B. S. Everitt, Cluster Analysis. Halsted Press, New York, 1980. [43] G. Salton, Automatic Text Processing. AddisonWesley, 1989.
[44] C. Stanfill and D. Waltz, “Toward memory-based reasoning,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1213–1228, 1986.
[45] R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart, Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York, Wiley, 1973, b-Swain Q327 .D847.
[46] E. J. Glover, S. Lawrence, W. P. Birmingham, and C. L. Giles, “Architecture of a metasearch en- gine that supports user information needs,” in Proceedings of the eighth international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 1999, pp. 210–216.
[47] E. J. Glover, G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, W. P. Birmingham, A. Kruger, C. L. Giles, and D. M. Pennock, “Improving category specific web search by learning query modifications,” in Applications and the Internet, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 Symposium on. IEEE, 2001, pp. 23–32.
[48] F. M. Coetzee, E. Glover, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles, “Feature selection in web applications by roc in- flections and powerset pruning,” in Applications and the Internet, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 Symposium on. IEEE, 2001, pp. 5–14.
[49] R. Kraft, F. Maghoul, C. C. Chang, and R. Kumar, “Searching with Context,” in Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-15), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2006.
[50] B. Xiang, D. Jiang, J. Pei, X. Sun, E. Chen, and H. Li, “Context-aware ranking in web search,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 451–458.
[51] X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai, “Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 43–50.
[52] S. Han, D. He, Z. Yue, and J. Jiang, “Contextual support for collaborative information retrieval,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, ser. CHIIR ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 33–42.
[53] C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, R. Perego, F. Silvestri, and G. Tolomei, “Identifying task-based sessions in search engine query logs,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ser. WSDM ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 277–286.
[54] W. Hua, Y. Song, H. Wang, and X. Zhou, “Identifying users’ topical tasks in web search,” in Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ser. WSDM ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 93–102.
[55] R. Mehrotra and E. Yilmaz, “Towards hierarchies of search tasks & subtasks,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’15 Companion. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015, pp. 73–74.
[56] D. Jiang, J. Pei, and H. Li, “Mining search and browse logs for web search: A survey,” ACM Trans- actions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 4, no. 4, p. 57, 2013.
[57] J. J. Rocchio, “Relevance feedback in information retrieval,” in The Smart retrieval system - experi- ments in automatic document processing, G. Salton, Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971, pp. 313–323.
[58] B. J. Gao, D. C. Anastasiu, and X. Jiang, “Utilizing User-input Contextual Terms for Query Disam- biguation,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, ser. COLING ’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, pp. 329– 337.
[59] Z. Bar-Yossef and N. Kraus, “Context-sensitive query auto-completion,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 107–116.
[60] E. Kharitonov, C. Macdonald, P. Serdyukov, and I. Ounis, “Intent models for contextualising and diversifying query suggestions,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Confer- ence on information & knowledge management, ser. CIKM’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 2303–2308.
[61] F. Cai and M. de Rijke, “Selectively personalizing query auto-completion,” in Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 993–996.
[62] F. Scholer and H. E. Williams, “Query association for effective retrieval,” in Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM Press, 2002, pp. 324–331.
[63] B. Billerbeck, F. Scholer, H. E. Williams, and J. Zobel, “Query expansion using associated queries,” in Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM Press, 2003, pp. 2–9.
[64] P. Sondhi, R. Chandrasekar, and R. Rounthwaite, “Using query context models to construct topical search engines,” in Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context. ACM, 2010, pp. 75–84.
[65] C. Carpineto and G. Romano, “A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval,”
ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2012.
[66] G. Sukthankar, C. Geib, H. H. Bui, D. Pynadath, and R. P. Goldman, Plan, activity, and intent recognition: theory and practice. Newnes, 2014.
[67] E. Horvitz, J. Breese, D. Heckerman, D. Hovel, and K. Rommelse, “The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, 1998, pp. 256–265. [Online].
Available: citeseer.nj.nec.com/horvitz98lumiegravere.html
[68] M. Claypool, P. Le, M. Wased, and D. Brown, “Implicit interest indicators,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ser. IUI ’01. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2001, pp. 33–40.
[69] S. Jung, J. L. Herlocker, and J. Webster, “Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search,”
Information Processing & Management, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 791–807, 2007.
[70] Y. Kim, A. Hassan, R. W. White, and I. Zitouni, “Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfac- tion,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 2014, pp. 193–202.
[71] Q. Guo and E. Agichtein, “Beyond dwell time: estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior,” in Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2012, pp. 569–578.
[72] L. A. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay, “Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search,” in Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2004, pp. 478–479.
[73] J. Huang, R. White, and G. Buscher, “User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2012, pp. 1341–1350.
[74] Q. Guo, H. Jin, D. Lagun, S. Yuan, and E. Agichtein, “Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance,” in Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2013, pp. 153–162.
[75] D. Lagun, C.-H. Hsieh, D. Webster, and V. Navalpakkam, “Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search,” in Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 2014, pp. 113–122.
[76] S. Han, I.-H. Hsiao, and D. Parra, “A study of mobile information exploration with multi-touch interactions,” in International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, 2014, pp. 269–276.
[77] S. M. Beitzel, E. C. Jensen, A. Chowdhury, D. Grossman, and O. Frieder, “Hourly analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log,” in Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’04. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2004, pp. 321–328.
[78] G. Somlo and A. E. Howe, “QueryTracker: An Agent for Tracking Persistent Information Needs,” in AAMAS ’04: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 488–495.
[79] T. Lau and E. Horvitz, “Patterns of search: analyzing and modeling web query refinement,” in UM99 User Modeling. Springer, 1999, pp. 119–128.
[80] X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai, “Implicit user modeling for personalized search,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2005, pp. 824–831.
[81] T. S?tajner, D. Mladeni´c, and M. Grobelnik, “Exploring contexts and actions in knowledge processes,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies, 2010.
[82] G. Dong and J. Pei, Sequence data mining. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, vol. 33.
[83] M. Grobelnik, D. Mladenic, and J. Ferlez, “Probabilistic temporal process model for knowledge pro- cesses: handling a stream of linked text,” in Conf. on Data Mining and Data Warehouses (SiKDD 2009). Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2009.
[84] M. Melucci et al., “Contextual search: A computational framework.” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 6, no. 4-5, pp. 257–405, 2012.
[85] R. Armstrong, D. Freitag, T. Joachims, and T. Mitchell, “WebWatcher: A Learning Apprentice for the World Wide Web,” in AAAI Spring Symposium on Information Gathering, 1995, pp. 6–12.
[86] D. Mladenic, “Personal WebWatcher: Design and implementation,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, Technical Report IJS-DP-7472, 1996.
[87] H. Lieberman, “Letizia: An agent that assists Web browsing,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI-95, C. S. Mellish, Ed. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc.: San Mateo, CA, USA, 1995, pp. 924–929.
[88] M. J. Pazzani, J. Muramatsu, and D. Billsus, “Syskill & Webert: Identifying interesting Web sites,” in AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 54–61.
[89] M. Q. W. Baldonado and T. Winograd, “SenseMaker: an information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user’s interests,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, 1997, pp. 11–18.
[90] M. Balabanovi´c and Y. Shoham, “Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation,” Communica- tions of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 66–72, 1997.
[91] M. Jaczynski and B. Trousse, “BROADWAY: A World Wide Web browsing advisor reusing past navigations from a group of users,” in Proceedings of the Third UK Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (UKCBR3), Manchester, UK, September 1997.
[92] J. Rucker and M. J. Polanco, “Siteseer: personalized navigation for the Web,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 73–76, 1997.
[93] J. Budzik and K. J. Hammond, “User interactions with everyday applications as context for just- in-time information access,” in Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New Orleans, Louisiana: ACM Press, 2000.
[94] J. Budzik, K. J. Hammond, and L. Birnbaum, “Information Access in Context,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 14, pp. 37–53, 2001.
[95] B. Rhodes, “The wearable remembrance agent: A system for augmented memory,” in Personal Tech- nologies Journal Special Issue on Wearable Computing, Personal Technologies, vol. 1, 1997, pp. 218– 224.
[96] B. J. Rhodes, N. Minar, and J. Weaver, “Wearable Computing Meets Ubiquitous Computing: Reaping the best of both worlds,” in The Proceedings of The Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’99), San Francisco, CA, October 1999.
[97] R. W. DeVaul and A. Pentland, “Toward the zero attention interface: Wearable subliminal cuing for short term memory support memory,” in Proceedings of ISWC, 2002, pp. 141–142.
[98] A. K. Dey and G. D. Abowd, “CybreMinder: A context-aware system for supporting reminders,” in
International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, HUC 2000, 2000, pp. 172–186.
[99] P. P. Maglio, R. Barrett, C. S. Campbell, and T. Selker, “SUITOR: an attentive information system,” in Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, 2000, pp. 169–176.
[100] P. P. Maglio and C. S. Campbell, “Attentive agents,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, no. 3, pp.
47–51, 2003.
[101] D. B. Leake, T. Bauer, A. Maguitman, and D. C. Wilson, “Capture, Storage and Reuse of Lessons about Information Resources: Supporting Task-Based Information Search,” in Proceedings of the AAAI-00 Workshop on Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems. Austin, Texas. AAAI Press, 2000, pp. 33–37.
[102] T. Bauer and D. Leake, “A Research Agent Architecture for Real Time Data Collection and Analysis,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Infrastructure for Agents, MAS, and Scalable MAS, 2001.
[103] S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, J. Cadiz, G. Jancke, R. Sarin, and D. C. Robbins, “Stuff I’Ve Seen: A System for Personal Information Retrieval and Re-use,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’03. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003, pp. 72–79.
[104] A. J. Sellen, A. Fogg, M. Aitken, S. Hodges, C. Rother, and K. Wood, “Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: An experimental study using sensecam,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI ’07. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 81–90.
[105] A. Fuxman, P. Pantel, Y. Lv, A. Chandra, P. Chilakamarri, M. Gamon, D. Hamilton, B. Kohlmeier,
D. Narayanan, E. Papalexakis, and B. Zhao, “Contextual insights,” in Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, ser. WWW Com- panion ’14. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2014, pp. 265–266.
[106] N. Ratprasartporn, J. Po, A. Cakmak, S. Bani-Ahmad, and G. Ozsoyoglu, “Context-based literature digital collection search,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 277–301, Jan. 2009.
[107] P. H. Delgado, A. G. Maguitman, V. M. Ferracutti, and L. A. Herrera, “Using thematic contexts and previous solutions for maintaining and accessing institutional repositories,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, 2011.
[108] N. L. Mitzig, M. S. Mitzig, F. A. Martinez, R. A. Piriz, V. M. Ferracutti, M. P. Gonzalez, and A. G. Maguitman, “Scielo suggester: An intelligent support tool for cataloging library resources,” Library & Information Science Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 39 – 51, 2016.
[109] M. Sappelli, S. Verberne, and W. Kraaij, “Adapting the interactive activation model for context recognition and identification,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), vol. 6, no. 3, p. 22, 2016.
[110] B. Newsom, R. Mittu, M. A. Livingston, S. Russell, J. W. Decker, E. Leadbetter, I. S. Moskowitz,
A. Gilliam, C. Sibley, J. Coyne et al., “Modeling user behaviors to enable context-aware proactive decision support,” in Context-Enhanced Information Fusion. Springer, 2016, pp. 231–267.
[111] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, and T. Reichherzer, “Experience-Based Support for Human-Centered Knowl- edge Modeling,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 68, no. 0, pp. 77–87, 2014.
[112] C. Lorenzetti, A. Maguitman, D. Leake, F. Menczer, and T. Reichherzer, “Mining for topics to suggest knowledge model extensions,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 23:1–23:30, 2016.
[113] C. E. Grant, C. P. George, V. Kanjilal, S. Nirkhiwale, J. N. Wilson, and D. Z. Wang, “A topic- based search, visualization, and exploration system,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, ser. FLAIRS 2015, 2015, pp. 43–48.
[114] A. Figueroa and G. Neumann, “Context-aware semantic classification of search queries for browsing community question-answering archives,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, no. C, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2016.
[115] R. L. Cecchini, C. M. Lorenzetti, A. G. Maguitman, and F. Menczer, “A Semantic Framework for Evaluating Topical Search Methods,” CLEI Electronic Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, April 2011.
[116] J. Budzik, K. J. Hammond, L. Birnbaum, and M. Krema, “Beyond similarity,” in Proceedings of the 2000 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Web Search. AAAI Press, 2000.
[117] B. Smyth and P. McClave, “Similarity vs. diversity,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. Vancouver, Canada, 2001.
[118] C. Carpineto, M. D’Amico, and G. Romano, “Evaluating subtopic retrieval methods: Clustering versus diversification of search results,” Information Processing Management, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 358–373, Mar. 2012.
[119] Y. Kim and W. B. Croft, “Diversifying query suggestions based on query documents,” in Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 891–894.
[120] R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis, “Search result diversification,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–90, Mar. 2015.
[121] S. Chernov, G. Demartini, E. Herder, M. Kopycki, and W. Nejdl, “Evaluating personal information management using an activity logs enriched desktop dataset,” in Personal Information Management Workshop at CHI 2008, April 2008.
[122] D. Devaurs, A. S. Rath, and S. N. Lindstaedt, “Exploiting the user interaction context for automatic task detection,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 58–80, 2012.
[123] L. Tamine-Lechani, M. Boughanem, and M. Daoud, “Evaluation of contextual information retrieval effectiveness: overview of issues and research,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2010.
[124] E. Vicente-Lo´pez, L. M. de Campos, J. M. Ferna´ndez-Luna, J. F. Huete, A. Tagua-Jim´enez, and
C. Tur-Vigil, “An automatic methodology to evaluate personalized information retrieval systems,”
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2015.
[125] P. Borlund, “A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information retrieval evaluations: A meta-evaluation,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 394–413, 2016.
[126] M. Balabanovi´c, Y. Shoham, and Y. Yun, “An Adaptive Agent for Automated Web Browsing,” Stan- ford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA, Tech. Rep., 1995.
[127] C. G. Thomas and G. Fischer, “Using agents to personalize the Web,” in Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, 1997, pp. 53–60.
[128] F. Asnicar and C. Tasso, “ifWeb: a Prototype of user models based intelligent agent for document filtering and navigation in the World Wide Web,” in Sixth International Conference on User Modeling, Chia Laguna, Sardinia, Italy, June 1997.
[129] A. Voss and T. Kreifelts, “SOAP: social agents providing people with useful information,” in Pro- ceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work: the integration challenge. ACM Press, 1997, pp. 291–298.
[130] H. Lieberman, N. W. V. Dyke, and A. S. Vivacqua, “Let’s browse: a collaborative Web browsing agent,” in Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’99). Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press, 1999, pp. 65–68.
[131] X. Fu, J. Budzik, and K. J. Hammond, “Mining navigation history for recommendation,” in Intelligent User Interfaces, 2000, pp. 106–112.
[132] B. J. Rhodes, “Margin Notes: Building a Contextually Aware Associative Memory,” in The Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’00), January 2000.
[133] S. Middleton, D. DeRoure, and N. Shadbolt, “Capturing knowledge of user preferences: Ontologies in recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the ACM K-CAP’01. Victoria, Canada: ACM Press, 2001.
[134] D. Salber, A. K. Dey, and G. D. Abowd, “The context toolkit: Aiding the development of context- enabled applications,” in CHI, 1999, pp. 434–441.
[135] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, and T. Reichherzer, “Topic Extraction and Extension to Support Concept Mapping,” in Proceedings of FLAIRS-2003. AAAI Press, 2003, pp. 325–329.
[136] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, T. Reichherzer, A. Can˜as, M. Carvalho, M. Arguedas, S. Brenes, and T. Es- kridge, “Aiding Knowledge Capture by Searching for Extensions of Knowledge Models,” in Proceedings of KCAP-2003. ACM Press, 2003.
[137] R. Kraft, F. Maghoul, and C. C. Chang, “Y! q: contextual search at the point of inspiration,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2005, pp. 816–823.
[138] C. A. N. Soules and G. R. Ganger, “Connections: Using context to enhance file search,” in Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, ser. SOSP ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 119–132.
[139] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, and T. Reichherzer, “Exploiting rich context: An incremental approach to context-based web search,” Modeling and Using Context, pp. 1–10, 2005.
[140] J. Zakos and B. Verma, “A novel context-based technique for web information retrieval,” World Wide Web, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 485–503, 2006.
[141] C. Dichev and D. Dicheva, “Context-based search in topic-centered digital repositories,” NSDL: To- wards Reusable and Shareable Courseware: Topic Maps-Based Digital Libraries, 2006.
[142] R. Redon, A. Larsson, R. Leblond, and B. Longueville, “Vivace context based search platform,” Mod- eling and Using Context, pp. 397–410, 2007.
[143] T. Deng, L. Zhao, L. Feng, and W. Xue, “Information re-finding by context: A brain memory inspired approach,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ser. CIKM ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 1553–1558.
[144] C. Chesn˜evar, A. Maguitman, E. Estevez, and R. Brena, “Integrating argumentation technologies and context-based search for intelligent processing of citizens’ opinion in social media,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ser. ICEGOV ’12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2012, pp. 166–170.
[145] J. Cordeiro, B. Antunes, and P. Gomes, “Context-based recommendation to support problem solving in software development,” in Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE), 2012 Third International Workshop on. IEEE, 2012, pp. 85–89.
[146] B. Antunes, J. Cordeiro, and P. Gomes, “Context-based search in software development,” in Proceed- ings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press, 2012, pp. 937–942.
[147] X. Han, W. Wei, C. Miao, J.-P. Mei, and H. Song, “Context-aware personal information retrieval from multiple social networks,” IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 18–28, 2014.
[148] J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, “An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. an account of basic findings.” Psychological review, vol. 88, no. 5, p. 375, 1981.
[149] P. Barford, M. Dacier, T. G. Dietterich, M. Fredrikson, J. T. Giffin, S. Jajodia, S. Jha, J. H. Li, P. Liu,
P. Ning et al., “Cyber sa: Situational awareness for cyber defense,” Cyber Situational Awareness, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2010.
[150] J. M. Bradshaw, M. Carvalho, L. Bunch, T. Eskridge, P. J. Feltovich, M. Johnson, and D. Kidwell, “Sol: An agent-based framework for cyber situation awareness,” KI-Ku¨nstliche Intelligenz, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 2012.
[151] M. Naderpour, J. Lu, and G. Zhang, “An intelligent situation awareness support system for safety- critical environments,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 59, pp. 325–340, 2014.
[152] U. Franke and J. Brynielsson, “Cyber situational awareness–a systematic review of the literature,”
Computers & Security, vol. 46, pp. 18–31, 2014.
[153] J. Lester, K. Branting, and B. Mott, “Conversational agents,” The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing, pp. 220–240, 2004.
[154] R. Porzel and M. Strube, Towards context-adaptive natural language processing systems. na, 2002. [155] J. F. Allen, L. K. Schubert, G. Ferguson, P. Heeman, C. H. Hwang, T. Kato, M. Light, N. Martin,
B. Miller, M. Poesio et al., “The trains project: A case study in building a conversational planning
agent,” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–48, 1995.
[156] G. Ferguson, J. F. Allen et al., “Trips: An integrated intelligent problem-solving assistant,” in
AAA/IAAI, 1998, pp. 567–572.
[157] J. F. Allen, D. K. Byron, M. Dzikovska, G. Ferguson, L. Galescu, and A. Stent, “Toward conversational human-computer interaction,” AI magazine, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 27, 2001.
[158] S. Small, T. Strzalkowski, T. Janack, T. Liu, S. Ryan, R. Salkin, N. Shimizu, P. Kantor, D. Kelly,
R. Rittman et al., “Hitiqa: Scenario based question answering,” in Proceedings of HLT, 2004.
[159] R. Porzel, I. Gurevych, and R. Malaka, “In context: Integrating domain-and situation-specific knowl- edge,” SmartKom: Foundations of Multimodal Dialogue Systems, pp. 269–284, 2006.
[160] A. Toniolo, T. J. Norman, A. Etuk, F. Cerutti, R. W. Ouyang, M. Srivastava, N. Oren, T. Dropps, J. A. Allen, and P. Sullivan, “Supporting reasoning with different types of evidence in intelligence analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015, pp. 781–789.
[161] A. Toniolo, A. D. Preece, W. Webberley, T. J. Norman, P. Sullivan, and T. Dropps, “Conversational intelligence analysis,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, ser. ICDCN ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 42:1–42:6.
[162] A. Preece, C. Gwilliams, C. Parizas, D. Pizzocaro, J. Z. Bakdash, and D. Braines, “Conversational sensing,” in SPIE Sensing Technology + Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014, pp. 91 220I–91 220I.
[163] A. C. Graesser, K. Wiemer-Hastings, P. Wiemer-Hastings, R. Kreuz, T. R. Group et al., “Autotutor: A simulation of a human tutor,” Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 1999.
[164] A. C. Graesser, H. Li, and C. Forsyth, “Learning by communicating in natural language with conver- sational agents,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 374–380, 2014.
[165] E. Arnott, P. Hastings, and D. Allbritton, “Research methods tutor: Evaluation of a dialogue-based tutoring system in the classroom,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 694–698, 2008.
[166] A. Sarrafzadeh, S. Alexander, F. Dadgostar, C. Fan, and A. Bigdeli, “How do you know that I don’t understand? A look at the future of intelligent tutoring systems,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1342–1363, 2008.
[167] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
[168] J. Teevan, D. Ramage, and M. R. Morris, “#twittersearch: A comparison of microblog search and web search,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ser. WSDM ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 35–44.
[169] A. McCallum, X. Wang, and A. Corrada-Emmanuel, “Topic and role discovery in social networks with experiments on enron and academic email,” J. Artif. Int. Res., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 249–272, Oct. 2007.
[170] D. Ramage, S. Dumais, and D. Liebling, “Characterizing microblogs with topic models,” in Proc.
ICWSM 2010. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, May 2010.
[171] X. Yan, J. Guo, Y. Lan, and X. Cheng, “A biterm topic model for short texts,” in Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2013, pp. 1445–1456.
[172] T. Lin, W. Tian, Q. Mei, and H. Cheng, “The dual-sparse topic model: Mining focused topics and focused terms in short text,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 539–550.
[173] J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He, “Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers,” in Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 2010, pp. 261–270.
[174] L. Hong and B. D. Davison, “Empirical study of topic modeling in twitter,” in Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics. ACM, 2010, pp. 80–88.
[175] R. Mehrotra, S. Sanner, W. Buntine, and L. Xie, “Improving lda topic models for microblogs via tweet pooling and automatic labeling,” in Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2013, pp. 889–892.
[176] A. Zimmermann, A. Lorenz, and R. Oppermann, “An operational definition of context,” in Interna- tional and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context. Springer, 2007, pp. 558–571.
[177] A. Bechmann and S. Lomborg, “Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation,” New media & society, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 765–781, 2013.
[178] S. Malinen, “Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 46, pp. 228–238, 2015.
[179] P. N. Terevinto, A. Pont, J. A. Gil, and J. Domenech, “A flexible workload model based on roles of in- teractive users in social networks,” in IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops, 2016. IFIP, 2016, pp. 524–529.
[180] T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo, “Earthquake shakes twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’10. New York, NY,
[2] P. Makris, D. N. Skoutas, and C. Skianis, “A survey on context-aware mobile and wireless networking: on networking and computing environments’ integration,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 362–386, 2013.
[3] C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, “Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 414–454, 2014.
[4] J. Augusto, A. Aztiria, D. Kramer, and U. Alegre, “A survey on the evolution of the notion of context- awareness,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–30, 2018.
[5] A. K. Dey, G. D. Abowd, and D. Salber, “A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications,” Human-computer interaction, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 97–166, 2001.
[6] K. A. De Jong, “An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1975, aAI7609381.
[7] C. Bolchini, C. A. Curino, E. Quintarelli, F. A. Schreiber, and L. Tanca, “A data-oriented survey of context models,” ACM Sigmod Record, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 19–26, 2007.
[8] D. Boughareb and N. Farah, “Context in information retrieval,” in International Conference on Con- trol, Decision and Information Technologies, ser. CoDIT 2014, 2014, pp. 589–594.
[9] H. P. Luhn, “A statistical approach to mechanized encoding and searching of literary information,”IBM Journal of research and development, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 309–317, 1957.
[10] S. K. Jones, “A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 28, pp. 11–21, 1972.
[11] G. Salton and C. Yang, “On the specification of term values in automatic indexing,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 29, pp. 351–372, 1973.
[12] S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, G. W. Furnas, and R. A. Harshman, “Indexing by latent semantic analysis,” Journal of the American Society of Information Science, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 391–407, 1990.
[13] P. Resnik, “Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1, ser. IJCAI’95. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1995, pp. 448–453.
[14] D. Lin, “An information-theoretic definition of similarity.” in In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Interna- tional Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 98, 1998, pp. 296–304.
[15] P. D. Turney, “Mining the web for synonyms: Pmi-ir versus lsa on toefl,” in Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, ser. EMCL ’01. London, UK, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2001, pp. 491–502.
[16] D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent dirichlet allocation,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 3, pp. 993–1022, Mar. 2003.
[17] A. G. Maguitman, F. Menczer, H. Roinestad, and A. Vespignani, “Algorithmic detection of semantic similarity,” in WWW ’05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 107–116.
[18] A. Gruber, M. Rosen-zvi, and Y. Weiss, “Hidden topic markov models,” in In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2007.
[19] D. M. Blei, “Probabilistic topic models,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 77–84, Apr.
2012.
[20] X. Wang, A. McCallum, and X. Wei, “Topical n-grams: Phrase and topic discovery, with an application to information retrieval,” in Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007). IEEE, 2007, pp. 697–702.
[21] N. Cristianini, J. Shawe-Taylor, and H. Lodhi, “Latent semantic kernels,” in Proceedings of the Eigh- teenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ser. ICML ’01. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2001, pp. 66–73.
[22] N. Liu, B. Zhang, J. Yan, Q. Yang, S. Yan, Z. Chen, F. Bai, and W.-Y. Ma, “Learning similarity measures in non-orthogonal space,” in Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2004, pp. 334–341.
[23] A. Maguitman, D. Leake, T. Reichherzer, and F. Menczer, “Dynamic Extraction of Topic Descriptors and Discriminators: Towards Automatic Context-Based Topic Search,” in Proceedings of the Thir- teenth Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM). New York: ACM Press, November 2004, pp. 463–472.
[24] C. M. Lorenzetti and A. G. Maguitman, “A semi-supervised incremental algorithm to automatically formulate topical queries,” Information Sciences, vol. 179, no. 12, pp. 1881–1892, 2009, including Special Issue on Web Search.
[25] R. R. Rada, H. Mili, E. Bicknell, and M. Blettner, “Development and application of a metric on Semantic Nets,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 1989.
[26] J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath, “Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X), Taiwan, 1998.
[27] L. Finkelstein, E. Gabrilovich, Y. Matias, E. Rivlin, Z. Solan, G. Wolfman, and E. Ruppin, “Placing search in context: The concept revisited,” in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2001, pp. 406–414.
[28] R. Kaptein and J. Kamps, “Explicit extraction of topical context,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1548–1563, 2011.
[29] P. A. Chirita, W. Nejdl, R. Paiu, and C. Kohlschu¨tter, “Using odp metadata to personalize search,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 178–185.
[30] J. Trajkova and S. Gauch, “Improving ontology-based user profiles,” in Coupling approaches, cou- pling media and coupling languages for information retrieval. LE CENTRE DE HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES D’INFORMATIQUE DOCUMENTAIRE, 2004, pp. 380–390.
[31] S. Calegari and G. Pasi, “Personal ontologies: Generation of user profiles based on the {YAGO} ontology,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 640 – 658, 2013, personalization and Recommendation in Information Access.
[32] N. Hernandez, J. Mothe, C. Chrisment, and D. Egret, “Modeling context through domain ontologies,”
Inf. Retr., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 143–172, Apr. 2007.
[33] B. J. Rhodes and T. Starner, “The Remembrance Agent: A continuously running automated in- formation retrieval system,” in Proceedings of The First International Conference on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi Agent Technology (PAAM ’96). London, UK: AAAI Press, April 1996, pp. 487–495.
[34] J. Budzik and K. Hammond, “Watson: Anticipating and contextualizing information needs,” in 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ, 1999.
[35] J.-J. Yang and R. Korfhage, “Query optimization in information retrieval using genetic algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1993, pp. 603–613.
[36] R. L. Cecchini, C. M. Lorenzetti, A. G. Maguitman, and N. B. Brignole, “Using genetic algorithms to evolve a population of topical queries,” Information Processing and Management, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1863–1878, 2008.
[37] ——, “Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms for Context-based Search,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1258–1274, 2010.
[38] O. Cord´on, E. Herrera-Viedma, and M. Luque, “Evolutionary learning of boolean queries by multiob- jective genetic programming,” in International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Springer, 2002, pp. 710–719.
[39] L. Ardissono and G. Bosio, “Context-dependent awareness support in open collaboration environ- ments,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 223–254, 2012.
[40] J. Greenberg, “An examination of the impact of lexical-semantic relationships on retrieval effectiveness during the query expansion process,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1998.
[41] M. Chui, “i still haven’t found what i’m looking for: Web searching as query refinement,” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 2002.
[42] B. S. Everitt, Cluster Analysis. Halsted Press, New York, 1980. [43] G. Salton, Automatic Text Processing. AddisonWesley, 1989.
[44] C. Stanfill and D. Waltz, “Toward memory-based reasoning,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1213–1228, 1986.
[45] R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart, Pattern classification and scene analysis. New York, Wiley, 1973, b-Swain Q327 .D847.
[46] E. J. Glover, S. Lawrence, W. P. Birmingham, and C. L. Giles, “Architecture of a metasearch en- gine that supports user information needs,” in Proceedings of the eighth international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 1999, pp. 210–216.
[47] E. J. Glover, G. W. Flake, S. Lawrence, W. P. Birmingham, A. Kruger, C. L. Giles, and D. M. Pennock, “Improving category specific web search by learning query modifications,” in Applications and the Internet, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 Symposium on. IEEE, 2001, pp. 23–32.
[48] F. M. Coetzee, E. Glover, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles, “Feature selection in web applications by roc in- flections and powerset pruning,” in Applications and the Internet, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 Symposium on. IEEE, 2001, pp. 5–14.
[49] R. Kraft, F. Maghoul, C. C. Chang, and R. Kumar, “Searching with Context,” in Proceedings of the 15th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-15), Edinburgh, Scotland, May 2006.
[50] B. Xiang, D. Jiang, J. Pei, X. Sun, E. Chen, and H. Li, “Context-aware ranking in web search,” in Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 451–458.
[51] X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai, “Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 43–50.
[52] S. Han, D. He, Z. Yue, and J. Jiang, “Contextual support for collaborative information retrieval,” in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, ser. CHIIR ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 33–42.
[53] C. Lucchese, S. Orlando, R. Perego, F. Silvestri, and G. Tolomei, “Identifying task-based sessions in search engine query logs,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ser. WSDM ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 277–286.
[54] W. Hua, Y. Song, H. Wang, and X. Zhou, “Identifying users’ topical tasks in web search,” in Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ser. WSDM ’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 93–102.
[55] R. Mehrotra and E. Yilmaz, “Towards hierarchies of search tasks & subtasks,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’15 Companion. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015, pp. 73–74.
[56] D. Jiang, J. Pei, and H. Li, “Mining search and browse logs for web search: A survey,” ACM Trans- actions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), vol. 4, no. 4, p. 57, 2013.
[57] J. J. Rocchio, “Relevance feedback in information retrieval,” in The Smart retrieval system - experi- ments in automatic document processing, G. Salton, Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1971, pp. 313–323.
[58] B. J. Gao, D. C. Anastasiu, and X. Jiang, “Utilizing User-input Contextual Terms for Query Disam- biguation,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, ser. COLING ’10. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010, pp. 329– 337.
[59] Z. Bar-Yossef and N. Kraus, “Context-sensitive query auto-completion,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 107–116.
[60] E. Kharitonov, C. Macdonald, P. Serdyukov, and I. Ounis, “Intent models for contextualising and diversifying query suggestions,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Confer- ence on information & knowledge management, ser. CIKM’13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 2303–2308.
[61] F. Cai and M. de Rijke, “Selectively personalizing query auto-completion,” in Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 993–996.
[62] F. Scholer and H. E. Williams, “Query association for effective retrieval,” in Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM Press, 2002, pp. 324–331.
[63] B. Billerbeck, F. Scholer, H. E. Williams, and J. Zobel, “Query expansion using associated queries,” in Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM Press, 2003, pp. 2–9.
[64] P. Sondhi, R. Chandrasekar, and R. Rounthwaite, “Using query context models to construct topical search engines,” in Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context. ACM, 2010, pp. 75–84.
[65] C. Carpineto and G. Romano, “A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval,”
ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 1–50, 2012.
[66] G. Sukthankar, C. Geib, H. H. Bui, D. Pynadath, and R. P. Goldman, Plan, activity, and intent recognition: theory and practice. Newnes, 2014.
[67] E. Horvitz, J. Breese, D. Heckerman, D. Hovel, and K. Rommelse, “The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Madison, WI, 1998, pp. 256–265. [Online].
Available: citeseer.nj.nec.com/horvitz98lumiegravere.html
[68] M. Claypool, P. Le, M. Wased, and D. Brown, “Implicit interest indicators,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ser. IUI ’01. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2001, pp. 33–40.
[69] S. Jung, J. L. Herlocker, and J. Webster, “Click data as implicit relevance feedback in web search,”
Information Processing & Management, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 791–807, 2007.
[70] Y. Kim, A. Hassan, R. W. White, and I. Zitouni, “Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfac- tion,” in Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 2014, pp. 193–202.
[71] Q. Guo and E. Agichtein, “Beyond dwell time: estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior,” in Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2012, pp. 569–578.
[72] L. A. Granka, T. Joachims, and G. Gay, “Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www search,” in Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2004, pp. 478–479.
[73] J. Huang, R. White, and G. Buscher, “User see, user point: gaze and cursor alignment in web search,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2012, pp. 1341–1350.
[74] Q. Guo, H. Jin, D. Lagun, S. Yuan, and E. Agichtein, “Mining touch interaction data on mobile devices to predict web search result relevance,” in Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2013, pp. 153–162.
[75] D. Lagun, C.-H. Hsieh, D. Webster, and V. Navalpakkam, “Towards better measurement of attention and satisfaction in mobile search,” in Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval. ACM, 2014, pp. 113–122.
[76] S. Han, I.-H. Hsiao, and D. Parra, “A study of mobile information exploration with multi-touch interactions,” in International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, 2014, pp. 269–276.
[77] S. M. Beitzel, E. C. Jensen, A. Chowdhury, D. Grossman, and O. Frieder, “Hourly analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log,” in Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’04. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2004, pp. 321–328.
[78] G. Somlo and A. E. Howe, “QueryTracker: An Agent for Tracking Persistent Information Needs,” in AAMAS ’04: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 488–495.
[79] T. Lau and E. Horvitz, “Patterns of search: analyzing and modeling web query refinement,” in UM99 User Modeling. Springer, 1999, pp. 119–128.
[80] X. Shen, B. Tan, and C. Zhai, “Implicit user modeling for personalized search,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2005, pp. 824–831.
[81] T. S?tajner, D. Mladeni´c, and M. Grobelnik, “Exploring contexts and actions in knowledge processes,” in Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Context, Information and Ontologies, 2010.
[82] G. Dong and J. Pei, Sequence data mining. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007, vol. 33.
[83] M. Grobelnik, D. Mladenic, and J. Ferlez, “Probabilistic temporal process model for knowledge pro- cesses: handling a stream of linked text,” in Conf. on Data Mining and Data Warehouses (SiKDD 2009). Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2009.
[84] M. Melucci et al., “Contextual search: A computational framework.” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 6, no. 4-5, pp. 257–405, 2012.
[85] R. Armstrong, D. Freitag, T. Joachims, and T. Mitchell, “WebWatcher: A Learning Apprentice for the World Wide Web,” in AAAI Spring Symposium on Information Gathering, 1995, pp. 6–12.
[86] D. Mladenic, “Personal WebWatcher: Design and implementation,” School of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA, Technical Report IJS-DP-7472, 1996.
[87] H. Lieberman, “Letizia: An agent that assists Web browsing,” in Proceedings of the Fourteenth Inter- national Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI-95, C. S. Mellish, Ed. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Morgan Kaufmann publishers Inc.: San Mateo, CA, USA, 1995, pp. 924–929.
[88] M. J. Pazzani, J. Muramatsu, and D. Billsus, “Syskill & Webert: Identifying interesting Web sites,” in AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1, 1996, pp. 54–61.
[89] M. Q. W. Baldonado and T. Winograd, “SenseMaker: an information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user’s interests,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, 1997, pp. 11–18.
[90] M. Balabanovi´c and Y. Shoham, “Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation,” Communica- tions of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 66–72, 1997.
[91] M. Jaczynski and B. Trousse, “BROADWAY: A World Wide Web browsing advisor reusing past navigations from a group of users,” in Proceedings of the Third UK Case-Based Reasoning Workshop (UKCBR3), Manchester, UK, September 1997.
[92] J. Rucker and M. J. Polanco, “Siteseer: personalized navigation for the Web,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 73–76, 1997.
[93] J. Budzik and K. J. Hammond, “User interactions with everyday applications as context for just- in-time information access,” in Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. New Orleans, Louisiana: ACM Press, 2000.
[94] J. Budzik, K. J. Hammond, and L. Birnbaum, “Information Access in Context,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 14, pp. 37–53, 2001.
[95] B. Rhodes, “The wearable remembrance agent: A system for augmented memory,” in Personal Tech- nologies Journal Special Issue on Wearable Computing, Personal Technologies, vol. 1, 1997, pp. 218– 224.
[96] B. J. Rhodes, N. Minar, and J. Weaver, “Wearable Computing Meets Ubiquitous Computing: Reaping the best of both worlds,” in The Proceedings of The Third International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’99), San Francisco, CA, October 1999.
[97] R. W. DeVaul and A. Pentland, “Toward the zero attention interface: Wearable subliminal cuing for short term memory support memory,” in Proceedings of ISWC, 2002, pp. 141–142.
[98] A. K. Dey and G. D. Abowd, “CybreMinder: A context-aware system for supporting reminders,” in
International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, HUC 2000, 2000, pp. 172–186.
[99] P. P. Maglio, R. Barrett, C. S. Campbell, and T. Selker, “SUITOR: an attentive information system,” in Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, 2000, pp. 169–176.
[100] P. P. Maglio and C. S. Campbell, “Attentive agents,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, no. 3, pp.
47–51, 2003.
[101] D. B. Leake, T. Bauer, A. Maguitman, and D. C. Wilson, “Capture, Storage and Reuse of Lessons about Information Resources: Supporting Task-Based Information Search,” in Proceedings of the AAAI-00 Workshop on Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems. Austin, Texas. AAAI Press, 2000, pp. 33–37.
[102] T. Bauer and D. Leake, “A Research Agent Architecture for Real Time Data Collection and Analysis,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Infrastructure for Agents, MAS, and Scalable MAS, 2001.
[103] S. Dumais, E. Cutrell, J. Cadiz, G. Jancke, R. Sarin, and D. C. Robbins, “Stuff I’Ve Seen: A System for Personal Information Retrieval and Re-use,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informaion Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’03. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003, pp. 72–79.
[104] A. J. Sellen, A. Fogg, M. Aitken, S. Hodges, C. Rother, and K. Wood, “Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past?: An experimental study using sensecam,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI ’07. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, pp. 81–90.
[105] A. Fuxman, P. Pantel, Y. Lv, A. Chandra, P. Chilakamarri, M. Gamon, D. Hamilton, B. Kohlmeier,
D. Narayanan, E. Papalexakis, and B. Zhao, “Contextual insights,” in Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, ser. WWW Com- panion ’14. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2014, pp. 265–266.
[106] N. Ratprasartporn, J. Po, A. Cakmak, S. Bani-Ahmad, and G. Ozsoyoglu, “Context-based literature digital collection search,” The VLDB Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 277–301, Jan. 2009.
[107] P. H. Delgado, A. G. Maguitman, V. M. Ferracutti, and L. A. Herrera, “Using thematic contexts and previous solutions for maintaining and accessing institutional repositories,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, 2011.
[108] N. L. Mitzig, M. S. Mitzig, F. A. Martinez, R. A. Piriz, V. M. Ferracutti, M. P. Gonzalez, and A. G. Maguitman, “Scielo suggester: An intelligent support tool for cataloging library resources,” Library & Information Science Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 39 – 51, 2016.
[109] M. Sappelli, S. Verberne, and W. Kraaij, “Adapting the interactive activation model for context recognition and identification,” ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), vol. 6, no. 3, p. 22, 2016.
[110] B. Newsom, R. Mittu, M. A. Livingston, S. Russell, J. W. Decker, E. Leadbetter, I. S. Moskowitz,
A. Gilliam, C. Sibley, J. Coyne et al., “Modeling user behaviors to enable context-aware proactive decision support,” in Context-Enhanced Information Fusion. Springer, 2016, pp. 231–267.
[111] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, and T. Reichherzer, “Experience-Based Support for Human-Centered Knowl- edge Modeling,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 68, no. 0, pp. 77–87, 2014.
[112] C. Lorenzetti, A. Maguitman, D. Leake, F. Menczer, and T. Reichherzer, “Mining for topics to suggest knowledge model extensions,” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 23:1–23:30, 2016.
[113] C. E. Grant, C. P. George, V. Kanjilal, S. Nirkhiwale, J. N. Wilson, and D. Z. Wang, “A topic- based search, visualization, and exploration system,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, ser. FLAIRS 2015, 2015, pp. 43–48.
[114] A. Figueroa and G. Neumann, “Context-aware semantic classification of search queries for browsing community question-answering archives,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 96, no. C, pp. 1–13, Mar. 2016.
[115] R. L. Cecchini, C. M. Lorenzetti, A. G. Maguitman, and F. Menczer, “A Semantic Framework for Evaluating Topical Search Methods,” CLEI Electronic Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, April 2011.
[116] J. Budzik, K. J. Hammond, L. Birnbaum, and M. Krema, “Beyond similarity,” in Proceedings of the 2000 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Web Search. AAAI Press, 2000.
[117] B. Smyth and P. McClave, “Similarity vs. diversity,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning. Vancouver, Canada, 2001.
[118] C. Carpineto, M. D’Amico, and G. Romano, “Evaluating subtopic retrieval methods: Clustering versus diversification of search results,” Information Processing Management, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 358–373, Mar. 2012.
[119] Y. Kim and W. B. Croft, “Diversifying query suggestions based on query documents,” in Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, ser. SIGIR ’14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 891–894.
[120] R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis, “Search result diversification,” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–90, Mar. 2015.
[121] S. Chernov, G. Demartini, E. Herder, M. Kopycki, and W. Nejdl, “Evaluating personal information management using an activity logs enriched desktop dataset,” in Personal Information Management Workshop at CHI 2008, April 2008.
[122] D. Devaurs, A. S. Rath, and S. N. Lindstaedt, “Exploiting the user interaction context for automatic task detection,” Applied Artificial Intelligence, vol. 26, no. 1-2, pp. 58–80, 2012.
[123] L. Tamine-Lechani, M. Boughanem, and M. Daoud, “Evaluation of contextual information retrieval effectiveness: overview of issues and research,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 2010.
[124] E. Vicente-Lo´pez, L. M. de Campos, J. M. Ferna´ndez-Luna, J. F. Huete, A. Tagua-Jim´enez, and
C. Tur-Vigil, “An automatic methodology to evaluate personalized information retrieval systems,”
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–37, 2015.
[125] P. Borlund, “A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information retrieval evaluations: A meta-evaluation,” Journal of Documentation, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 394–413, 2016.
[126] M. Balabanovi´c, Y. Shoham, and Y. Yun, “An Adaptive Agent for Automated Web Browsing,” Stan- ford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA, Tech. Rep., 1995.
[127] C. G. Thomas and G. Fischer, “Using agents to personalize the Web,” in Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM Press, 1997, pp. 53–60.
[128] F. Asnicar and C. Tasso, “ifWeb: a Prototype of user models based intelligent agent for document filtering and navigation in the World Wide Web,” in Sixth International Conference on User Modeling, Chia Laguna, Sardinia, Italy, June 1997.
[129] A. Voss and T. Kreifelts, “SOAP: social agents providing people with useful information,” in Pro- ceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work: the integration challenge. ACM Press, 1997, pp. 291–298.
[130] H. Lieberman, N. W. V. Dyke, and A. S. Vivacqua, “Let’s browse: a collaborative Web browsing agent,” in Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI’99). Los Angeles, CA, USA: ACM Press, 1999, pp. 65–68.
[131] X. Fu, J. Budzik, and K. J. Hammond, “Mining navigation history for recommendation,” in Intelligent User Interfaces, 2000, pp. 106–112.
[132] B. J. Rhodes, “Margin Notes: Building a Contextually Aware Associative Memory,” in The Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI ’00), January 2000.
[133] S. Middleton, D. DeRoure, and N. Shadbolt, “Capturing knowledge of user preferences: Ontologies in recommender systems,” in Proceedings of the ACM K-CAP’01. Victoria, Canada: ACM Press, 2001.
[134] D. Salber, A. K. Dey, and G. D. Abowd, “The context toolkit: Aiding the development of context- enabled applications,” in CHI, 1999, pp. 434–441.
[135] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, and T. Reichherzer, “Topic Extraction and Extension to Support Concept Mapping,” in Proceedings of FLAIRS-2003. AAAI Press, 2003, pp. 325–329.
[136] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, T. Reichherzer, A. Can˜as, M. Carvalho, M. Arguedas, S. Brenes, and T. Es- kridge, “Aiding Knowledge Capture by Searching for Extensions of Knowledge Models,” in Proceedings of KCAP-2003. ACM Press, 2003.
[137] R. Kraft, F. Maghoul, and C. C. Chang, “Y! q: contextual search at the point of inspiration,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2005, pp. 816–823.
[138] C. A. N. Soules and G. R. Ganger, “Connections: Using context to enhance file search,” in Proceedings of the Twentieth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, ser. SOSP ’05. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005, pp. 119–132.
[139] D. Leake, A. Maguitman, and T. Reichherzer, “Exploiting rich context: An incremental approach to context-based web search,” Modeling and Using Context, pp. 1–10, 2005.
[140] J. Zakos and B. Verma, “A novel context-based technique for web information retrieval,” World Wide Web, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 485–503, 2006.
[141] C. Dichev and D. Dicheva, “Context-based search in topic-centered digital repositories,” NSDL: To- wards Reusable and Shareable Courseware: Topic Maps-Based Digital Libraries, 2006.
[142] R. Redon, A. Larsson, R. Leblond, and B. Longueville, “Vivace context based search platform,” Mod- eling and Using Context, pp. 397–410, 2007.
[143] T. Deng, L. Zhao, L. Feng, and W. Xue, “Information re-finding by context: A brain memory inspired approach,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ser. CIKM ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 1553–1558.
[144] C. Chesn˜evar, A. Maguitman, E. Estevez, and R. Brena, “Integrating argumentation technologies and context-based search for intelligent processing of citizens’ opinion in social media,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ser. ICEGOV ’12. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2012, pp. 166–170.
[145] J. Cordeiro, B. Antunes, and P. Gomes, “Context-based recommendation to support problem solving in software development,” in Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering (RSSE), 2012 Third International Workshop on. IEEE, 2012, pp. 85–89.
[146] B. Antunes, J. Cordeiro, and P. Gomes, “Context-based search in software development,” in Proceed- ings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IOS Press, 2012, pp. 937–942.
[147] X. Han, W. Wei, C. Miao, J.-P. Mei, and H. Song, “Context-aware personal information retrieval from multiple social networks,” IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 18–28, 2014.
[148] J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, “An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. an account of basic findings.” Psychological review, vol. 88, no. 5, p. 375, 1981.
[149] P. Barford, M. Dacier, T. G. Dietterich, M. Fredrikson, J. T. Giffin, S. Jajodia, S. Jha, J. H. Li, P. Liu,
P. Ning et al., “Cyber sa: Situational awareness for cyber defense,” Cyber Situational Awareness, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2010.
[150] J. M. Bradshaw, M. Carvalho, L. Bunch, T. Eskridge, P. J. Feltovich, M. Johnson, and D. Kidwell, “Sol: An agent-based framework for cyber situation awareness,” KI-Ku¨nstliche Intelligenz, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 2012.
[151] M. Naderpour, J. Lu, and G. Zhang, “An intelligent situation awareness support system for safety- critical environments,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 59, pp. 325–340, 2014.
[152] U. Franke and J. Brynielsson, “Cyber situational awareness–a systematic review of the literature,”
Computers & Security, vol. 46, pp. 18–31, 2014.
[153] J. Lester, K. Branting, and B. Mott, “Conversational agents,” The Practical Handbook of Internet Computing, pp. 220–240, 2004.
[154] R. Porzel and M. Strube, Towards context-adaptive natural language processing systems. na, 2002. [155] J. F. Allen, L. K. Schubert, G. Ferguson, P. Heeman, C. H. Hwang, T. Kato, M. Light, N. Martin,
B. Miller, M. Poesio et al., “The trains project: A case study in building a conversational planning
agent,” Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–48, 1995.
[156] G. Ferguson, J. F. Allen et al., “Trips: An integrated intelligent problem-solving assistant,” in
AAA/IAAI, 1998, pp. 567–572.
[157] J. F. Allen, D. K. Byron, M. Dzikovska, G. Ferguson, L. Galescu, and A. Stent, “Toward conversational human-computer interaction,” AI magazine, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 27, 2001.
[158] S. Small, T. Strzalkowski, T. Janack, T. Liu, S. Ryan, R. Salkin, N. Shimizu, P. Kantor, D. Kelly,
R. Rittman et al., “Hitiqa: Scenario based question answering,” in Proceedings of HLT, 2004.
[159] R. Porzel, I. Gurevych, and R. Malaka, “In context: Integrating domain-and situation-specific knowl- edge,” SmartKom: Foundations of Multimodal Dialogue Systems, pp. 269–284, 2006.
[160] A. Toniolo, T. J. Norman, A. Etuk, F. Cerutti, R. W. Ouyang, M. Srivastava, N. Oren, T. Dropps, J. A. Allen, and P. Sullivan, “Supporting reasoning with different types of evidence in intelligence analysis,” in Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2015, pp. 781–789.
[161] A. Toniolo, A. D. Preece, W. Webberley, T. J. Norman, P. Sullivan, and T. Dropps, “Conversational intelligence analysis,” in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Networking, ser. ICDCN ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 42:1–42:6.
[162] A. Preece, C. Gwilliams, C. Parizas, D. Pizzocaro, J. Z. Bakdash, and D. Braines, “Conversational sensing,” in SPIE Sensing Technology + Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2014, pp. 91 220I–91 220I.
[163] A. C. Graesser, K. Wiemer-Hastings, P. Wiemer-Hastings, R. Kreuz, T. R. Group et al., “Autotutor: A simulation of a human tutor,” Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 1999.
[164] A. C. Graesser, H. Li, and C. Forsyth, “Learning by communicating in natural language with conver- sational agents,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 374–380, 2014.
[165] E. Arnott, P. Hastings, and D. Allbritton, “Research methods tutor: Evaluation of a dialogue-based tutoring system in the classroom,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 694–698, 2008.
[166] A. Sarrafzadeh, S. Alexander, F. Dadgostar, C. Fan, and A. Bigdeli, “How do you know that I don’t understand? A look at the future of intelligent tutoring systems,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1342–1363, 2008.
[167] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
[168] J. Teevan, D. Ramage, and M. R. Morris, “#twittersearch: A comparison of microblog search and web search,” in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ser. WSDM ’11. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 35–44.
[169] A. McCallum, X. Wang, and A. Corrada-Emmanuel, “Topic and role discovery in social networks with experiments on enron and academic email,” J. Artif. Int. Res., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 249–272, Oct. 2007.
[170] D. Ramage, S. Dumais, and D. Liebling, “Characterizing microblogs with topic models,” in Proc.
ICWSM 2010. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, May 2010.
[171] X. Yan, J. Guo, Y. Lan, and X. Cheng, “A biterm topic model for short texts,” in Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 2013, pp. 1445–1456.
[172] T. Lin, W. Tian, Q. Mei, and H. Cheng, “The dual-sparse topic model: Mining focused topics and focused terms in short text,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 539–550.
[173] J. Weng, E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He, “Twitterrank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers,” in Proceedings of the third ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 2010, pp. 261–270.
[174] L. Hong and B. D. Davison, “Empirical study of topic modeling in twitter,” in Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics. ACM, 2010, pp. 80–88.
[175] R. Mehrotra, S. Sanner, W. Buntine, and L. Xie, “Improving lda topic models for microblogs via tweet pooling and automatic labeling,” in Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 2013, pp. 889–892.
[176] A. Zimmermann, A. Lorenz, and R. Oppermann, “An operational definition of context,” in Interna- tional and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context. Springer, 2007, pp. 558–571.
[177] A. Bechmann and S. Lomborg, “Mapping actor roles in social media: Different perspectives on value creation in theories of user participation,” New media & society, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 765–781, 2013.
[178] S. Malinen, “Understanding user participation in online communities: A systematic literature review of empirical studies,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 46, pp. 228–238, 2015.
[179] P. N. Terevinto, A. Pont, J. A. Gil, and J. Domenech, “A flexible workload model based on roles of in- teractive users in social networks,” in IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) and Workshops, 2016. IFIP, 2016, pp. 524–529.
[180] T. Sakaki, M. Okazaki, and Y. Matsuo, “Earthquake shakes twitter users: Real-time event detection by social sensors,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW ’10. New York, NY,
Downloads
Published
2018-04-04
Issue
Section
Articles
License
CLEIej is supported by its home institution, CLEI, and by the contribution of the Latin American and international researchers community, and it does not apply any author charges whatsoever for submitting and publishing. Since its creation in 1998, all contents are made publicly accesibly. The current license being applied is a (CC)-BY license (effective October 2015; between 2011 and 2015 a (CC)-BY-NC license was used).
